π― Learning Objectives
- π Students will be able to define judicial review and explain its significance in the U.S. government.
- π Students will identify the landmark Supreme Court case, *Marbury v. Madison*, as the origin of judicial review.
- πΆββοΈ Students will outline the key steps and criteria a case must meet to undergo judicial review.
- βοΈ Students will analyze the impact of judicial review on the balance of power among the branches of government.
π οΈ Materials Needed
- π Whiteboard or projector
- βοΈ Markers or pens
- π Handout: 'Steps of Judicial Review' (optional)
- π» Access to internet for *Marbury v. Madison* primary source excerpts (optional)
π Warm-up Activity (5 mins)
Engage: Ask students to brainstorm in pairs or individually: "What does it mean for a court to 'review' something?" Discuss briefly as a class, guiding them towards legal oversight.
π§ Main Instruction: Demystifying Judicial Review
βοΈ What is Judicial Review?
- π‘ Judicial review is the power of the courts, especially the Supreme Court, to determine whether acts of the legislative and executive branches are constitutional.
- π‘οΈ It serves as a crucial check on the power of other government branches, upholding the supremacy of the Constitution.
π The Genesis: Marbury v. Madison (1803)
- ποΈ Before 1803, the power of judicial review was implied but not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
- π₯ This landmark case, presided over by Chief Justice John Marshall, established the Supreme Court's authority of judicial review.
- π While Marbury didn't get his commission, the Court asserted its power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution (in this case, part of the Judiciary Act of 1789).
πΆββοΈ The Essential Steps of Judicial Review
For a case to be considered for judicial review by the Supreme Court, it must meet several criteria, often referred to as 'justiciability doctrines':
- 1οΈβ£ Case or Controversy Requirement: π§ββοΈ The Court can only rule on actual disputes between opposing parties; they cannot give advisory opinions. There must be a real, live issue.
- 2οΈβ£ Standing to Sue: π§ A party must have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of the case. They must show they have been personally injured or are in danger of being injured by the law or action in question.
- 3οΈβ£ Ripeness: β³ The case must be ready for review; it cannot be hypothetical or premature. All lower court remedies must typically be exhausted.
- 4οΈβ£ Mootness: π The issue must still be a live controversy. If the problem has already been resolved or the circumstances have changed, rendering a decision useless, the case is moot. (There are exceptions, like cases 'capable of repetition, yet evading review').
- 5οΈβ£ Political Question Doctrine: π³οΈ The Court will avoid cases that it deems to be purely political in nature and best resolved by the legislative or executive branches. Examples include questions of foreign policy or the impeachment process.
- 6οΈβ£ Federal Question: πΊπΈ The case must involve an interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, federal law, or treaties. State law issues alone are not subject to federal judicial review.
β
Practice Quiz: Test Your Knowledge!
- β Which Supreme Court case established the principle of judicial review?
a) McCulloch v. Maryland
b) Gibbons v. Ogden
c) Marbury v. Madison
d) Dred Scott v. Sandford
- π€ What is the primary purpose of judicial review in the U.S. system of government?
- βοΈ True or False: The Constitution explicitly grants the Supreme Court the power of judicial review.
- π« Explain the 'Mootness' doctrine and why it prevents certain cases from being heard by the Supreme Court.
- π§ββοΈ A citizen believes a new federal law unfairly taxes their specific hobby. Which step of judicial review must they satisfy to bring their case to court?
- π Provide an example of a situation that the Supreme Court would likely consider a 'political question' and thus avoid hearing.
- β¨ How does judicial review contribute to the system of checks and balances?