1 Answers
📚 Quick Study Guide: Schenck v. United States (1919)
- ⚖️ Case Overview: Charles Schenck, a Socialist Party general secretary, distributed leaflets during WWI opposing the draft. He was charged under the Espionage Act of 1917.
- 📜 Constitutional Question: Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for distributing leaflets violate his First Amendment right to freedom of speech?
- 🏛️ Court's Decision: Unanimous (9-0) decision against Schenck. The Court upheld his conviction, ruling that his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.
- 🔥 Key Precedent: Established the "clear and present danger" test. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously stated that speech that creates a "clear and present danger" of substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent is not protected.
- 🗣️ Analogy: The most famous analogy from the case is that the First Amendment does not protect a person "falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."
- ⏳ Context: This case was decided during wartime, which significantly influenced the Court's interpretation of free speech limitations.
- ➡️ Later Developments: The "clear and present danger" test was later refined and largely replaced by the "imminent lawless action" test (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969), which offers broader protection for speech.
🧠 Practice Quiz: First Amendment Limitations
1. What was the central legal question in Schenck v. United States?
- Did the Espionage Act of 1917 violate the Tenth Amendment?
- Did Schenck's actions constitute a violation of the Fifth Amendment?
- Did Schenck's conviction for distributing anti-draft leaflets violate his First Amendment rights?
- Was the Espionage Act an unconstitutional overreach of federal power?
2. Which legal test was established by the Supreme Court's decision in Schenck v. United States?
- The "lemon test"
- The "imminent lawless action" test
- The "undue burden" test
- The "clear and present danger" test
3. Who wrote the unanimous opinion for the Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States?
- Chief Justice John Marshall
- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
- Justice Louis Brandeis
4. The famous analogy about "falsely shouting fire in a theatre" was used in Schenck v. United States to illustrate what concept?
- The importance of freedom of assembly.
- That some speech, under certain circumstances, is not protected by the First Amendment.
- The government's power to regulate public safety.
- The difference between slander and libel.
5. What was the primary reason Charles Schenck was distributing leaflets?
- To promote a new political party.
- To protest the draft during World War I.
- To advocate for workers' rights.
- To criticize the Supreme Court's decisions.
6. The ruling in Schenck v. United States demonstrates that the First Amendment's protection of speech is:
- Absolute and without any limitations.
- Limited, especially during times of war or national crisis.
- Applicable only to political speech.
- Determined solely by public opinion.
7. Which later Supreme Court case largely replaced the "clear and present danger" test with a more speech-protective standard?
- Marbury v. Madison (1803)
- Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
- Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Click to see Answers
1. C
2. D
3. C
4. B
5. B
6. B
7. D
Join the discussion
Please log in to post your answer.
Log InEarn 2 Points for answering. If your answer is selected as the best, you'll get +20 Points! 🚀