In Chemistry, constructing a strong argument is crucial for interpreting experimental results, defending a hypothesis, and communicating scientific findings effectively. A solid argument consists of a clear claim, supported by relevant evidence and logical reasoning. Evidence can include experimental data, observations, or established scientific principles. The reasoning explains how the evidence supports the claim, demonstrating a cause-and-effect relationship or correlation. A well-constructed argument also acknowledges and addresses potential counterarguments or limitations.
Match each term with its definition:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1. Claim | a. Information that supports the claim. |
| 2. Evidence | b. A statement or conclusion that answers a question. |
| 3. Reasoning | c. Potential objections to your argument. |
| 4. Counterargument | d. The connection between evidence and claim. |
| 5. Hypothesis | e. A testable statement about how something works. |
Match the term on the left with its definition on the right.
Complete the paragraph using the words provided: data, valid, argument, conclusion, evidence.
A scientific __________ uses __________ to support a ___________. The __________ is drawn from the _________, showing the relationship between cause and effect. A strong argument must be __________.
Imagine you performed an experiment and the results contradict your initial hypothesis. How would you construct an argument to explain your findings, acknowledging the conflicting evidence?
Please log in to post your answer.
Log InEarn 2 Points for answering. If your answer is selected as the best, you'll get +20 Points! 🚀