1 Answers
π Introduction to Urban Models
Understanding urban structure is crucial in geography. Two prominent models, the Burgess Model and the Hoyt Sector Model, offer frameworks for analyzing the spatial organization of cities. While both attempt to explain urban patterns, they differ in their assumptions and representations.
ποΈ Burgess Model: Concentric Zones
The Burgess Model, also known as the Concentric Zone Model, was developed by sociologist Ernest Burgess in the 1920s. It proposes that cities grow outwards from a central business district (CBD) in a series of concentric zones.
- π’ CBD (Central Business District): ποΈ The innermost zone, characterized by commercial activities and high land values.
- π Transition Zone: ποΈ Surrounds the CBD, often containing industry and low-income housing.
- π‘ Working-Class Zone: π¨βπ©βπ§βπ¦ A zone of modest homes occupied by working-class families.
- π³ Residential Zone: π Consists of higher-quality housing and more affluent residents.
- ποΈ Commuter Zone: π The outermost zone, characterized by suburban areas and longer commutes.
π Hoyt Sector Model: Pie-Shaped Wedges
The Hoyt Sector Model, developed by economist Homer Hoyt in the 1930s, suggests that cities grow in wedge-shaped sectors radiating outwards from the CBD along transportation routes.
- π Transportation Routes: π£οΈ Key corridors that influence the direction of urban growth.
- π Industrial Sectors: π’ Tend to develop along transportation lines.
- ποΈ Residential Sectors: π³ High-income areas expand outwards, often away from industrial sectors.
- ποΈ CBD (Central Business District): π¦ The nucleus of the city, serving as the origin for sectoral growth.
| Feature | Burgess Model | Hoyt Sector Model |
|---|---|---|
| Shape of Growth | Concentric zones | Sectors or wedges |
| Primary Influence | Distance from the CBD | Transportation routes |
| Housing Patterns | Arranged in rings | Arranged in sectors, influenced by transportation and industry |
| Development Era | Early 20th Century | 1930s |
| Main Driver | Social factors, economic competition | Transportation corridors, rent gradients |
π Key Takeaways
- π‘ Burgess Model: π Simple and based on social factors, but less adaptable to modern cities.
- π Hoyt Sector Model: πΊοΈ Considers transportation and industry, offering a more realistic representation.
- π Both Models: π§ Provide valuable insights into urban structure, but have limitations and are often combined with other models for a more comprehensive understanding.
Join the discussion
Please log in to post your answer.
Log InEarn 2 Points for answering. If your answer is selected as the best, you'll get +20 Points! π